A16z Says ‘Stablecoin’ Term Outdated as Sector Hits $321B

Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) executive Robert Hackett has declared the term ‘stablecoin’ outdated, arguing that the technology has evolved far beyond its original purpose. In a report published Friday, Hackett described stablecoins as “core financial infrastructure,” with applications now extending to global payments, treasury operations, and institutional finance. The global stablecoin market is currently valued at over $321 billion, according to DeFiLlama.

Stablecoins were initially designed to offer a hedge against cryptocurrency volatility, pegged to stable assets like the US dollar or gold. “The name was straightforward, if slightly defensive,” Hackett said, referencing the early days of crypto when volatility was the norm. “But the technology has since outgrown the label.” He added that stability is now a baseline expectation, while innovation has shifted toward programmable financial services.

Hackett suggested that terms like “digital cash” or “programmable money” might better reflect the technology’s capabilities. However, he acknowledged these alternatives lack the simplicity and familiarity of ‘stablecoin.’ Much like outdated terms such as “horsepower” for engine strength or “electric lights,” Hackett said ‘stablecoin’ may persist simply due to habit.

The sector’s rapid growth underscores the evolving role of stablecoins. Initially used as a trading tool, they have expanded into key financial applications, including cross-border payments, treasury management, and decentralized finance (DeFi). Major players like Tether (USDT) and USD Coin (USDC) dominate the market, with Tether holding the largest share and USDC favored by institutions for its regulatory compliance and transparency. Newer entrants, such as algorithmic stablecoins and deposit tokens, further demonstrate the sector’s innovation.

The market potential is massive. A recent report from Coinbase highlighted that stablecoin transaction volumes could soon surpass those of Visa and Mastercard combined. This reflects the technology’s growing adoption by financial institutions and even governments. Legislative progress, such as the U.S. GENIUS Act passed in 2025, has also provided a clearer regulatory framework, boosting institutional confidence.

Not everyone agrees the term ‘stablecoin’ is detrimental. John Palmer, a developer and brand adviser, argued that while the name may feel “reactionary,” it has significant brand recognition, one that could help stablecoins achieve “10x the impact of crypto thus far.” Still, the debate highlights a broader shift in how the industry views its role in the global financial system.

As stablecoins continue their evolution, the focus is shifting from solving volatility to enabling seamless, programmable financial operations. Whether the name changes or not, their trajectory suggests they’ll play an increasingly central role in global finance—potentially replacing traditional payment networks and reshaping how money moves.

Image source: Shutterstock